CHECK OUT OUR EXCITING TRAINING MATERIAL! Log In Register

The Difference Between a FAT and a SAT

 

It’s a question commonly asked in the validation arena, what is the difference between a FAT and a SAT. This article will finally explain what the difference is and how in your next interview you will know exactly why each one is required. Any project that involves equipment being developed from a third party should have a FAT and SAT incorporated into the system life-cycle.

If both the FAT and SAT are performed correctly is will lead to a much easier IQ/OQ process.

What is a FAT

A FAT or Factory Acceptance Test is usually preformed at the vendor prior to shipping to a client. The vendor tests the system in accordance with the clients approved test plans and specifications to show that system is at a point to be installed and tested on site.

It’s an essential aspect of the whole system lifecycle and should be performed by experienced personnel. Time spent doing a proper FAT will lead to fewer problems when the equipment is installed on your site.

ISPE verdict:

The partial commissioning and qualification of equipment and/or systems prior to their shipment from the fabricator’s site.

Publication Source: ISPE Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing Facilities Baseline® Guide

GAMP verdict:

Factory Acceptance Test (FAT): (IEEE) An Acceptance Test in the Supplier’s factory, usually involving the Customer.

Publication Source: GAMP 4, Good Automated Manufacturing Practice Guide for Validation of Automated Systems

On acceptance of a FAT some items to look out for include:

  • Performed FAT Protocol
  • Maintenance and User’s manual
  • Recommended spare parts list
  • Certificate of compliance
  • As built technical drawings (electrical, mechanical, pneumatic & process schemes)
  • Materials certificates/data sheets
  • Main equipments data sheets
  • Instruments calibration certificates
  • Welding Processes qualification

What is a SAT

A SAT is a Site Acceptance Test the system is tested in accordance to client approved test plans and specifications to show the system is installed properly and interfaces with other systems and peripherals in its working environment.

ISPE verdict:

Inspection and /or dynamic testing of the systems or major system components to support the qualification of an equipment system conducted and documented at the manufacturing site.

Publication Source: ISPE Commissioning and Qualification Baseline® Guide (March 2001)

Below is a list of some items that should be considered when performing a SAT:

  • Finishing Visual check
  • Main components visual check
  • Internal box pressure and ventilation setting
  • Utilities functionality and setting check
  • Functionality/Interlocks Verification (Mechanical & Software)
  • Safety devices and interlocks check
  • Operator’s training

Related Reading

Please check the link below for related articles on FAT’s and SAT’s

7 thoughts on “The Difference Between a FAT and a SAT

  1. As important a URS with clearly defined requirements.

    All verifications should satisfy the intended project needs.

    Industries should not find a URS document less important

  2. According to this article – Can one consider SAT as actually the “commissioning ” process ?

  3. A SAT does not necessarily take part of the life cycle process. It cannot substitite the IQ, OQ, PQ documentation. For the aroval of a software a FAT, SAT document cannot substitite the qualification and validation documentation.

  4. Nice explanation, could have been better if given a detailed explanation with an example viz a major processing equipment with the team involved in testing both FAT and SAT, checking against what document, who prepares this master document and who approves etc.

  5. Your Comment FAT includes broader utility functions which may not be performed either during SAT or OQ.
    For viz the reactor may be provided with VFD for running at different rpm but the application part will be run
    at constant rpm to get the desired quality of the product.This is generally applicable for equipment designed for multiproduct services.

  6. I believe FAT, can anticipate IQ/OQ, and so contibute to fast start on costumer site.Any one can inform if FDA agree with this?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Privacy | Terms © 2006 - 2014 askaboutvalidation. All Rights Reserved
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO